- About
- Membership
- Resources
- Awards
- Events
- Get Involved
At the 1999 NABT Convention in Fort Worth, Texas, members of the Four-Year College & University Section began a discussion of the need for a certification program for undergraduate programs in biology. At this meeting, a committee was established by the Four-Year Section of NABT to develop a proposal for evaluating and certifying college and university departments offering undergraduate degrees in biology. Individuals volunteered to construct a framework for such a certification program, with Eileen Gregory serving as Coordinator. Possible criteria were identified and subcommittees were established to work on each of the criteria. These subcommittees worked via e-mail with varying efficiency over the next year, and their proposals were presented to the membership at the 2000 Annual Convention in Orlando.
The development of guidelines was discussed in a special session at the 2001 NABT Annual Convention in Montreal. At this meeting, the proposal was again discussed. A video of that session can be found at:http://ra.okstate.edu:8080/ramgen/french/biology/trainer.smi. Members in attendance reaffirmed their support of this proposal and encouraged the Four-Year Section to continue this project. It was proposed that the Two-Year College Section and other professional organizations be part of the development process since the guidelines could have an impact on their members. As a result of the ensuing discussion, it was decided that (owing to the difficulty and cost of developing a certification program) the Section should first develop a series of guidelines for use in self-assessment by biology programs.
As the establishment of the evaluation criteria requires a richer discussion than possible via e-mail, it was decided that Eileen Gregory should develop some preliminary criteria to serve as a starting point for discussions to be held at the 2002 Annual Convention in Cincinnati, Ohio. Participants at this session broke into small groups and worked on one of the six proposed criteria. The results of their work are linked to the main guidelines Web page. It was decided that these would be posted for comment by interested parties and reviewed again at the 2003 Meeting in Portland. Kerry Cheesman and a committee of members surveyed four-year programs to move our guidelines to the next level. In 2004, the NABT Board reviewed the guidelines and sent them back to the Four-Year College Section for minor edits. In 2006, Ann S. Lumsden was asked to chair the committee to finalize the Proposed Guidelines. The committee met with new members including Eileen Gregory and Kerry Cheesman, and divided the Guidelines. Each reviewed the document one more time. All suggestions were sent by e-mail to Ann S. Lumsden for inclusion in the final draft of this document. The final draft was sent to NABT President-Elect John Moore on February 6, 2008 for the spring 2008 Board Meeting.
Over the past 20 years, a number of professional societies in biological fields have considered the establishment of a certification program for biology programs at colleges and universities. Several of these organizations currently offer reviews of biology programs but none of these efforts have resulted in the establishment of a certification program. The reason is primarily that the amount of work required to initiate such a program is not considered appropriate to the goals of these professional societies.
NABT is an association dedicated to the support and professional development of biology teachers. Guidelines offered by NABT for evaluating biology programs would define characteristics that distinguish high-quality educational biology programs. These guidelines would be focused on evaluating only departments offering an undergraduate bachelor degree in biology; not to programs in botany, microbiology, molecular biology, zoology, etc.
The guidelines would help professors of biology reflect upon and evaluate their own efforts to provide the best educational experience for their students. Such a program, developed with input from biology educators nationwide, would provide individual departments with an external "authority" against which they could assess their own programs. Additionally, national standards and criteria developed for the profession would provide biology departments with a rationale for improvements justifiable to administrators independent of the local setting. It is appropriate for NABT to provide these guidelines as their uses reflect the mission of NABT.
Evaluation Criteria: Faculty and Professional Development
Recommendations for Faculty Size and Composition
There should be a minimum of four full-time faculty in the department offering the degree in biology. These faculty members should all have a terminal degree in a biological discipline. The faculty should be diverse enough to provide a well-rounded approach to the discipline. This diversity includes: diversity in areas of domains, diversity in laboratory and field study research, diversity in types of graduate training and professional preparation, and diversity in sub-disciplines. Among the faculty, there should be a minimum of one faculty member with expertise in the botanical domain, and a minimum of one with expertise in the zoological domain. At least one faculty member should have expertise in the cellular and molecular aspects of biology, and at least one have expertise in field studies.
Recommendations for Teaching Load
Faculty should teach a maximum of the equivalent of 12 semester hours per term, with not more than 15 contact hours. The ratio of students to faculty member for non-laboratory biology courses should be no greater than 30 to 1; for laboratory courses, the ratio should be no greater than 24 to 1. Faculty members directing independent student studies or research, or performing administrative duties, should have their teaching load adjusted or be provided with compensation.
Recommendations for Professional Development
All faculty members should be engaged in professional development. This scholarship can be in either a biological discipline or pedagogical research. The department should have a balance between the two. Evidence of faculty scholarship includes, but is not limited to, presentations at regional and national conferences, publications of books and refereed articles, participation in professional development workshops, and procurement of external and internal grants.
All faculty members involved in the biology program should maintain currency in their field. Funds should be provided for each faculty member to attend a minimum of one professional meeting each year.
The following criteria describe a high-quality program in biology. The goal of these recommendations is to provide undergraduate students with the knowledge and skills necessary to enter a career or graduate program in the biological sciences. While each department offering a bachelor’s degree in biology should develop a curriculum that meets the needs of its students and institution, it should consider including as many aspects of these recommendations as possible.
Graduation Requirement
Students graduating with a bachelor’s degree in biology are required to have taken:
The curriculum should be designed so that students develop skills in writing scientific papers, performing statistical analysis of data, reading primary literature, and designing and completing valid scientific experiments.
The curriculum should be developed so that the nature of science is stressed and the investigative nature of science is infused throughout the curriculum. Group and individual research projects should be incorporated into all courses. The curriculum should be structured so that more extensive independent work and data analysis is required as the student progresses from introductory to upper-level courses. These projects should be developed so that students are exposed to library research, field-based research, and laboratory-based research.
Evolution as the unifying theory of biology should be specifically addressed within the curriculum and should be infused throughout the curriculum.
All aspects of the curriculum should adhere to state and federal safety guidelines.
General Recommendations
All full- and part-time staff should undergo safety training before beginning employment. This training should include the proper use of safety equipment, and the proper handling, storage, and disposal of chemical, biological, and microbiological materials.
Recommendations for Support Staff
It is not in the interest of the students or institution for faculty to spend significant amounts of time performing clerical tasks or preparing materials for teaching laboratories. For this reason, high-quality programs in biology should have the following:
General Recommendations
Faculty and students should have easy access to computers that can functionally run all of the software and various computer peripherals necessary for creating or viewing documents, multimedia presentations, and communication via the Internet. This includes peripherals such as flatbed scanners, digital cameras, digital projectors, CD-ROM burners, and slide scanners.
All computers for faculty and student use should have the appropriate network connections, hardware, and software for viewing documents or multimedia presentations (which could include CD?ROMs and Web pages), and communicating via the Internet. This includes:
Hardware—adequate RAM, sound and video cards, hard?drive space, CD drives, and CPU
Software—programs for word processing, creating spreadsheets and graphs, creating presentations, image processing, and Web page construction.
The institution should provide financial and technical support to regularly maintain and improve the computer technology available on campus.
Recommendations for Faculty
All full-time faculty should have computers in their offices. These computers should be replaced or upgraded every three years or less. The Biology Department should have flatbed scanners available for easy use by the faculty. Faculty who make regular use of scanners should have one in their office.
Instructors should have ready access to some method of showing multimedia presentations. This should include a digital projector or some other form of projecting digital images, a screen, and a computer. There should be a minimum of one multimedia classroom or movable projection system (projector and laptop) for every three faculty members. Faculty should have access to a computer classroom with sufficient numbers of computers so that there is at minimum one for every three students.
Training sessions on how to use the various computer technologies available and follow-up support should be provided to faculty.
Recommendations for Students
Students graduating with a degree in biology should be computer literate. They should be able to demonstrate an understanding of basic computer operations, be able to utilize computer technology for the exchange of information, and use computers to collect and analyze data, and produce publications.
Students should have computer access in each biology lab for data collection and analysis. There should be a minimum of one computer for every 10 students. Students should have out-of-class access to a computer lab facility. The computer facility should be open a minimum of 16 hours a day/5 days a week and should provide technical support personnel for at least 10 of those hours.
Training sessions on how to use the various computer technologies available should be provided to students
General Recommendations
There are at least two purposes for equipment within a biology program: 1) to prepare materials for instructional use or for research, and 2) to provide opportunities to gain skills in the operation and application of equipment.
Recommendations for the minimum equipment available for the preparation of instructional materials and/or for faculty/student research. Faculty should have easy access to the following:
Recommendations for equipment that students should be able to use properly upon graduation. Description of how this equipment is used in the biology curriculum is acceptable as evidence of student acquisition of these skills.
General Recommendation
A biology program should demonstrate evidence of community outreach. Recommendations for providing community outreach include providing human and physical resources.
Examples of Providing Human Resources
Biology programs may provide personnel, both faculty and students, to assist community science activites such as science contests, Olympiads or fairs, career days, advising/mentoring K?12 students, grant preparation assistance, after-school clubs, and summer camps. Biology programs should promote professional connections, involvement and development with K-12 biology/life science teachers through local, state, or regional outreach programs (such as NABT’s state, regional, and national outreach).
Programs may also choose to offer their scientific expertise to the community through workshops, lectures, and demonstrations and by offering pre-college student laboratory internships.
Finally, members of the program can show evidence of community outreach through participation in community service organizations and events.
Examples of Providing Physical Resources
Biology programs may offer community service through the loan of equipment and materials to pre-college teachers, including texts, laboratory procedures, software, visuals, and specimens.
The National Association of Biology Teachers empowers educators to provide the best possible biology and life science education for all students.
NABT, P.O. Box 3363, Warrenton, VA 20188
office@nabt.org | Fax: (202) 962-3939
(888) 501-NABT or (703) 264-9696
Thank you for visiting the NABT website.
Our privacy policy is found here.
Announcements for products or services on this website do not imply endorsement of or by NABT.
Website by Morweb.org
Copyright National Association of Biology Teachers
